CLARA M. COUNCIL, AS LEGAL GUARDIAN OF CARLA JEAN WALKER, A MINOR, APPELLANTS,
v.
FRANCES FRANCE AND L. T. FRANCE, APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court affirmed summary judgment dismissing a guardian's wrongful death claim on behalf of a minor child, holding that the defendant's settlement with the child's stepmother prior to the Garner decision, which first recognized children's independent wrongful death claims, should protect the defendant from successive litigation.
The court held that the defendant should not be required to pay additional damages on account of an intervening court decision and statutory reform when it had already made a full settlement in reliance on the well-settled law at the time of settlement. Children cannot pursue successive wrongful death claims after a defendant has already settled with the surviving spouse.
[1] A settlement of wrongful death claims made in reliance on the established law at the time of settlement will not be disturbed by a subsequent judicial decision that expan…
[2] A party who settles a wrongful death claim with the surviving spouse, believing they have fully compensated for the wrong based on the law then in effect, should not be s…
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“At the time appellees paid $100,000 to Hazel Walker, it was the well settled law of this State that she was the only one entitled to compensation for the death of Arthur Walker.”
Establishes that defendants acted in reliance on existing law at the time of settlement.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceArthur Floyd Walker was killed in an automobile accident on May 10, 1970, involving a car owned and driven by defendants Frances and L.T. France. Walk…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Settlement And Release cases and more on FLexlaw
Clara Council, as guardian of Carla Jean Walker, seeks review of a summary final judgment by which the lower court held that she could not maintain an action for the wrongful death of Carla’s father. Arthur Floyd Walker was killed in an automobile accident involving a car owned by L. T. France and driven by Frances France. Carla’s mother had predeceased Arthur Walker and subsequently he married Hazel Walker. After Arthur’s death, Hazel Walker instituted a suit for wrongful death which was settled. By the settlement, Hazel released all claims individually and as administratrix of the estate of Arthur Walker in exchange for which she received $100,000 for bodily injury and death and $920 damage to the automobile.
The only issue on appeal is whether the guardian of the child can maintain an action for wrongful death of the minor’s father in a case filed after Garner v. Ward, 251 So.2d 252 (Fla.1971), where the father’s widow had settled a case prior to that decision.
Before the Supreme Court’s decision in Garner, supra, the surviving children of a first marriage were left without a remedy for a parent wrongfully killed if a second wife survived. However, the court in Garner held that all persons who suffer loss as a result of the wrongful death and who are entitled to recover are proper parties. Subsequent to Garner, the legislature repealed Section 768.01, 768.02 and 768.03, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., and enacted Section 768.20 and 768.21, Florida Statutes, F. S.A., in order to conform to the Supreme Court’s holding in Garner and which was to become effective July 1, 1972.
In the case at bar, Arthur Walker was killed on May 10, 1970, and a settlement of claims was reached on May 5, 1971, between the second wife and appellee, two months prior to the court’s decision in Garner. The instant action was filed November 29, 1971.
At the time appellees paid $KL,000 to Hazel Walker, it was the well settled law of this State that she was the only one entitled to compensation for the death of Ar*491thur Walker. It is our opinion that appel-lee having relied on well settled law in making its earlier settlement should not now be required to pay an additional sum because of the intervening court decision. In the Garner case, there had been no final settlement or judgment in that the minors appealed from an order denying their intervention in the wrongful death suit. In the cáse at bar, Hazel Walker released ap-pellees from liability and they rightfully believed that they had fully compensated for the wrong. We believe that they should not be confronted with successive lawsuits brought after statutory changes imposing upon them additional liability.
For the foregoing reasons, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.
WIGGINTON and CARROLL, DONALD K., JJ., concur.