VINCENT RUNOWICH, APPELLANT,
v.
CITY OF ST. PETERSBURG, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1973-04-13
No. 72-448
LILES, A. C. J., and HOBSON and BOARDMAN, JJ., concur.
276 So. 2d 83 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1973) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the authority of Musetto v. City of Miami Beach, 82 So.2d 595 (Fla.1955), and City of Miami Beach v. Quinn, 149 Fla. 326, 5 So.2d 593 (1942).

LILES, A. C. J., and HOBSON and BOARDMAN, JJ., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Collom v. City OF ST. Petersburg, 400 So. 2d 507 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981)
    …ian traffic. Therefore, the argument goes, the city had no duty to maintain the area in a safe condition, and thus the summary judgment was proper for that reason. Reliance is placed upon our cryptic affirmance in Runowich v. City of St. Petersburg, 276 So. 2d 83 (Fla.2d DCA 1973), which relied on Musetto v. City of Miami Beach, 82 So. 2d 595 (Fla.1955). The cited cases involved injuries sustained in tripping over meter boxes or falling into holes in grassy areas provided for beautification — areas in which…
  • Arnold v. Louie L. Wainwright, 516 F.2d 964 (5th Cir. 1975)
    …on or the failure of the indictment or information to charge an offense shall be noticed by the court at any time during the pendency of the proceeding. . See, e. g., State v. Silva, Fla.1972, 259 So. 2d 153; Jones v. Florida, Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1973, 276 So. 2d 83; Johnson v. State, Fla.Dist.Ct. App.1972, 268 So. 2d 544, aff’d Fla.1974, 294 So. 2d 69; State v. Bethel, Fla.Dist.Ct.App. 1972, 268 So. 2d 557. . The appellants contended at the hearing on remand that a showing of actual prejudice was unnecessary…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw