CARROLL DUNSCOMBE, PETITIONER,
v.
BEACH CLUB COLONY OF STUART, INC., CITY OF STUART, A FLORIDA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ECOLOGICAL UTILITIES, INC., RESPONDENTS
CARROLL DUNSCOMBE, PETITIONER,
BEACH CLUB COLONY OF STUART, INC., CITY OF STUART, A FLORIDA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ECOLOGICAL UTILITIES, INC., RESPONDENTS
276 So. 2d 51
Florida Supreme Court (1973)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
Certiorari dismissed. 264 So.2d 465.
CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Denton v. Norman B. Getson, Norman B. Getson, P.A., 637 So. 2d 82 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994)…Fla.1955) (in order to justify striking of a pleading for being sham, it must be so undoubtedly false as not to be subject to genuine issue of fact); Pentecostal Holiness Church, Inc. v. Mauney, 270 So. 2d 762, 769 (Fla. 4th DCA 1972), cert. denied, 276 So. 2d 51 (Fla.1973) (sham pleadings are those which are inherently false and must have been known by the interposing party to be untrue); Sapienza v. Karland, Inc., 154 So. 2d 204 (Fla. 3d DCA 1963) (pleading may be considered sham when its falsity clearly a…
Authorities Cited
- Carroll Dunscombe v. Beach Club Colony OF Stuart, Inc., 264 So. 2d 465 (Fla. 4th DCA 1972)