RUTH SAVAGE, APPELLANT,
v.
CATHERINE PINNER BELL ET AL., APPELLEES
RUTH SAVAGE, APPELLANT,
CATHERINE PINNER BELL ET AL., APPELLEES
274 So. 2d 9
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1973)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed.
Meacham v. Noonan Construction Co., 260 So.2d 235 (1 Fla.App. 1972); and General Telephone Co. of Florida, Inc. v. Mahr, 153 So.2d 13 (2 Fla.App.1963).
SPECTOR, C. J., and RAWLS and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Siegel v. State, 289 So. 2d 764 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974)…entering a dwelling with intent to commit grand larceny and assaulting a person therein. He was adjudicated guilty and sentenced to twenty years in the state prison. The judgment and sentence were affirmed upon appeal. Siegel v. State, Fla.App.1973, 274 So. 2d 9. Thereafter, the appellant filed a motion pursuant to Rule 3.850, CrPR, 33 F.S.A., for relief from the judgment and sentence. The ground of the pro se motion was that the trial judge may have been prejudiced against the appellant. The trial court de…
Authorities Cited
- Gen. Tel. Co. OF Fla., Inc. v. Mahr, 153 So. 2d 13 (Fla. 2d DCA 1963)
- Meacham v. Noonan Constr. Co., 260 So. 2d 235 (Fla. 1st DCA 1972)
- State of Fla. Dep't OF Educ. v. Howard, 260 So. 2d 235 (Fla. 1st DCA 1972)