HELEN CAMPBELL GIFFEN, ET VIR,
v.
THE FLORIDA NATIONAL BANK & TRUST COMPANY AT MIAMI, AS ADMINISTRATOR, TRUSTEE AND GUARDIAN FOR EVA M. RIVARD, DECEASED, AND LAURENCE P. RIVARD, AS HEIR AT LAW OF EVA M. RIVARD, DECEASED

Fla. | 1940-06-14
Terrell, C. J., and Buford and Thomas, J. J., concur., Ci-iapman, J., concurs in opinion and judgment., Justices Whitfield and Brown not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.
143 Fla. 375 Florida Supreme Court (1940) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 196 So. 822
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The sole question presented here is one of fact. Concededly, the principles of law applicable to the evidence are well established. Our examination has not led us to the view that the chancellor was clearly in error in this disposition of the controversy; therefore, the decree is—

Affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., and Buford and Thomas, J. J., concur.

Ci-iapman, J., concurs in opinion and judgment.

Justices Whitfield and Brown not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • State v. City OF Fort Pierce, 88 So. 2d 135 (Fla. 1956)
    …t is obviously a situation in which the general law and the subsequent special law authorize the same tax and insofar as the two laws are inconsistent, the subsequently enacted special law would prevail. See Sanders v. City of Coleman, 143 Fla. 455, 196 So. 822. We have traced the legislative history of the above quoted provision of Section 6, Chapter 24528, Laws of Florida, Special Acts of 1947, as amended. We find that this provision in substantially its present form first appeared in the Charter of the…
  • S. Bell Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Town OF Surfside, 186 So. 2d 777 (Fla. 1966)
    …general law as to constitute an implied repeal thereof. City of St. Petersburg v. Pinellas County Power Co., 1924, 87 Fla. 315, 100 So. 509; West v. Town of Lake Placid, 1929, 97 Fla. 127, 120 So. 361; Sanders v. City of Coleman, 1940, 143 Fla. 455, 196 So. 822; Coen v. Lee, 1934, 116 Fla. 215, 156 So. 747. We find nothing in Sec. 32 of the town charter that is so inconsistent with the limitation of Sec. 205.02 as necessarily to imply its repeal so far as the Town of Surfside is concerned. To the extent t…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw