4TH DIMENSION INTERIORS, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
TIFFANY FURNITURE INDUSTRIES, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Florida appellate court reversed dismissal of amended third party complaint where trial court abused discretion by dismissing with prejudice based on untimely filing, given mutual delays by both parties and appellee's ten-month delay in moving to dismiss.
A trial court abuses its discretion by dismissing an amended third party complaint with prejudice solely on grounds of untimeliness when both parties have contributed to delays and the moving party waited nearly ten months to seek dismissal.
[1] A trial court abuses its discretion by dismissing an amended pleading with prejudice for untimeliness when the opposing party has itself delayed substantially in seeking…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAppellant filed a third party complaint in an action by Decorator Services against it. After the original complaint was dismissed, appellant was given…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Untimely Filing cases and more on FLexlaw
Appellant third party plaintiff appeals an order of the trial court dismissing its amended third party complaint with prejudice.
In an action by Decorator Services, Limited against appellant for services rendered in carpet installations for the plaintiff, the appellant filed a third party complaint against appellee and others. Appellee’s motion to dismiss that complaint was granted on May 5, 1971, and appellant was given 20 days in which to amend its third party complaint in order to state an appropriate cause of action. The amended third party complaint was filed on June 11, 1971, some seventeen days late. During the same period of time, the co-third party defendants moved to quash the service on the original third party complaint. The motion was granted but upon interlocutory appeal was reversed by this court on January 18, 1972. 4th Dimension Interiors, Inc. v. Decorator Services, Fla.App.1972, 256 So.2d 571. It was not until April 5, 1972, that appellee moved to dismiss appellant’s amended third party complaint with prejudice due to its untimely filing. Thus appellee’s motion to dismiss came approximately ten months after the complaint to which it was directed was filed and almost three months after this court’s decision in the related appeal.
We have reviewed the record in light of the foregoing facts, considering the mutual *128time delays of both appellant and appellee, and are of the opinion that the trial judge abused his discretion in dismissing the amended third party complaint of appellant with prejudice on the grounds of the untimeliness. Accordingly, we reverse.
Reversed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- 4TH Dimension Interiors, Inc. v. Decorator Servs. Ltd., 256 So. 2d 571 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972)