MICHAEL Z. TAINES, APPELLANT,
v.
EDGAR H. GALVIN ET AL., APPELLEES
MICHAEL Z. TAINES, APPELLANT,
EDGAR H. GALVIN ET AL., APPELLEES
272 So. 2d 824
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1973)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
We have examined the recall affidavits with care with regard to the requirement of the City Charter, the statutes, and the case law of this state. We find that the trial court did not err in determining them insufficient and entering the injunction here appealed. Richard v. Tomlinson, Fla.1951, 49 So.2d 798; Joyner v. Shuman, Fla.App. 1959, 116 So.2d 472; Tolar v. Johns, Fla.App. 1962, 147 So.2d 196.
No reversible error or departure from the essential requirements having been made to appear, the judgment is
Affirmed.
REED, C. J., and CROSS, J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Taines v. Galvin, 279 So. 2d 9 (Fla. 1973)…developed in this State, albeit in piecemeal fashion, a consistent and logical set of rules to govern the removal of city commissioners through recall elections. The decision of the District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, in the case sub judice, 272 So. 2d 824, is in harmony with this line of decisions. Although denying the petition for rehearing, and despite the fact that we have no jurisdiction to consider the case before us on the merits, we feel constrained to render a short opinion because of the su…
Authorities Cited
- Richard v. Tomlinson, 49 So. 2d 798 (Fla. 1951)
- Joyner v. Shuman, 116 So. 2d 472 (Fla. 2d DCA 1959)
- Tolar v. Johns, 147 So. 2d 196 (Fla. 2d DCA 1962)