EX PARTE WARMOUTH
EX PARTE WARMOUTH
17 Wall. 64
Supreme Court of the United States (1872)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 21 L. Ed. 543 · 1872 U.S. LEXIS 1312 · SCDB 1872-041
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
The CHIEF JUSTICE:
We are all of opinion that when a final decree shall be rendered in the Circuit Court in this ease, an appeal will lie to this court. We are also of opinion that this court has no jurisdiction in this case to issue a writ of prohibition until an appeal is taken.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Mayer, 235 U.S. 55 (U.S. 1914)
-
Ex parte Phenix Ins. Co. & Others, 118 U.S. 610 (U.S. 1886)
-
Creekmore v. Overton, 27 F.2d 504 (8th Cir. 1928)…in that state. Conveyances of property, attacked on the ground of fraud, will, wherever possible, be considered in the light of the local law. Schreyer v. Scott, 134 U. S. 405, 10 S. Ct. 579, 33 L. Ed. 955; Allen v. Massey, 84 U. S. (17 Wall.) 351, 21 L. Ed. 543; Wallace v. Penfield, 106 U. S. 260, 1 S. Ct. 216, 27 L. Ed. 147; Shauer v. Alterton, 151 U. S. 607, 14 S. Ct. 442, 38 L. Ed. 286; Klinger v. Hyman (C. C. A.) 223 F. 257. [2] The state of Oklahoma has adopted a statute (section.6020, Compiled Laws…