THE COLLECTOR
v.
DOSWELL & CO.

U.S. | 1872-12-01
16 Wall. 156 Supreme Court of the United States (1872)
Also reported at: 21 L. Ed. 350 · 1872 U.S. LEXIS 1143 · SCDB 1872-126

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The Collector sued Doswell & Co. to recover taxes allegedly owed on sales transactions, claiming the company acted as commercial brokers subject to a federal sales tax statute. The Supreme Court held that Doswell & Co. were not brokers making taxable sales but rather acted solely as buyers, and because the actual sellers had already paid the tax on those transactions, the company bore no tax obligation under the statute's provisions.


© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Opinion of the Court
Mr. Justice MILLER

Mr. Justice MILLER delivered the opinion of the court.

That, the plaintiff's did not make sales as commercial brokers is too cdear for argument. They acted wholly as buyers and other parties as sellers. The per cent, paid them by the sellers under the usage does not change their relation to the transaction.

The section of the statute referred to provides for taxes in a great variety of sales by bankers, brokers, and others, of stocks, real estate, &c., but it is always a tax on sales, and always collected of the seller,, or his broker or agent.

It is stated-in the agreement of facts submitted that a tax on all the sales for which the plaintiffs were assessed had been paid by the parties making the sales. This clearly relieved the plaintiffs from any obligation to pay this tax, if it otherwise existed, under the proviso of the ninth section of the statute.

It is so very clear, upon applying the statute to the agreed statement of facts, that the transactions charged against the plaintiffs were not sales, and not taxable to them, that it cannot be made plainer by argument; and,.while the law officers of the government have furnished a brief statement of the facts, they have neither cited the statute nor made an argument against the right of the plaintiffs to recover. The judgment of the Circuit Court in their favor is therefore

Aitirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw