BLITZ
v.
BROWN

U.S. | 1868-12-01
7 Wall. 693 Supreme Court of the United States (1868) Caution
Also reported at: 19 L. Ed. 280 · SCDB 1868-089 · 1868 U.S. LEXIS 1053
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
The CHIEF JUSTICE

The CHIEF JUSTICE delivered the opinion of the. court.

The filing of such a paper, as has been filed in this case, is not tLe filing of the transcript at the next term after the issuing of the writ of error, without which we can have no jurisdiction of the case. The motion to dismiss must be allowed.

• So much of the motion made in behalf of the plaintiff in error as asks' leave to withdiaw the record is .granted; but the residue of' the motion mustJbe denied. The case can be brought here only by a new writ of error.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Idaho & Or. Land Improvement Co. v. Bradbury, 132 U.S. 509 (U.S. 1889)
    …d is not’ authenticated, because neither the clerk nor the deputy clerk made the return “ under his hand,” as well as under the seal of the court, as required by Rule 8 of this court. In support of this motion, reliance is placed on Blitz v. Brown, 7 Wall. 693, in which the only certificate of authentication was a blank form, wanting both the seal of the court below and the signature of the clerk, so that there was really no authentication whatever; and this court therefore dismissed the writ of error, bu…
  • Ariz. & NEW Mexico Ry. Co. v. Clark, 235 U.S. 669 (U.S. 1915)

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw