THE CITY OF NEW ORLEANS, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
MYRA CLARK GAINES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The City of New Orleans sought to appropriate private property owned by Myra Clark Gaines for street construction and a court assessed damages to her, but the city defended a subsequent suit by Gaines for those damages by claiming that another party, Durell, had been adjudged the true owner in a separate proceeding and was entitled to the compensation instead. The Supreme Court affirmed the judgment in Gaines's favor because the city failed to introduce into evidence at trial the documents supporting its defense regarding Durell's ownership claim, leaving the record to show only valid pleadings supporting her right to the assessed damages.
© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Mr. Justice CATRON delivered the opinion of the court.
The city of New Orleans instituted proceedings by suit in a city court, pursuant to a statute of Louisiana, for opening two streets in the city, and appropriating the private property requisite -for that purpose; and on the tableau of assessment, certain squares of ground were put down as belonging to Mrs. Gaines, and the damages done to owner fixed at $2,363.
The assessment was decreed to Mrs. Gaines by the court where the proceeding was had; and she brought suit on this judgment against the city, in the United States Circuit Court.
The defendant, (the city,) by its answer, admitted the proceeding, and the damages assessed on the property described in the petition; but, in avoidance of the demand, averred that, a suit had been brought by one Durell against the city, claiming that he was the true owner of the property through which th¿ streets run, and which the commissioners of assessment had supposed to be owned by Mrs. Gaines, and demanding payment to him of the damages claimed by her; that in the Suit so brought by Durell, Mrs. Gaines had been personally cited as a party, at the instance of the city, for the purpose of having the question decided between her and Durell, as to the ownership of the property, and as to their respective, claims on the city for the sum awarded; and that in said suit judgment was rendered, determining the question in favor of Durell; and this judgment is pleaded in bar of the present suit.
Various documents were exhibited with the answer, and filed in the Circuit Court, on behalf of the city, including a record of the suit by Durell against the,city, and the recovery of the damages for extending the streets; but nothing appears in the record showing that these documents were given in evidence on the trial;'nor did the judge before whom the cause was heard make any statement of the facts found by him, as the usual ' practice is, where the Circuit Court in Louisiana tries issues of fact without the intervention of a jury.
The cause as presented to us simply shows a judgment in Mrs. Gaines’s favor, with regular pleadings to warrant it; and beyond this, contains nothing that this coui’t can notice, as a court of error. It is ordered that the judgment below be affirmed.