JACOB STRADER AND OTHERS, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,
v.
CHRISTOPHER GRAHAM
JACOB STRADER AND OTHERS, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,
CHRISTOPHER GRAHAM
18 How. 602
Supreme Court of the United States (1855)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 15 L. Ed. 464 · SCDB 1855-069 · 1855 U.S. LEXIS 742
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Lion Bonding & Sur. Co. v. Karatz, 262 U.S. 640 (U.S. 1923)…Fed. 788; In re Standard Fuller’s Earth Co., 186 Fed. 578; In re Rogers, 116 Fed. 435. Compare In re Watts, 190 U. S. 1; Randolph v. Scruggs, 190 U. S. 533. Inglee v. Coolidge, 2 Wheat. 363, 368; McIver v. Wattles, 9 Wheat. 650; Strader v. Graham, 18 How. 602; Citizens’ Bank v. Cannon, 164 U. S. 319. In removal cases the rule was changed by Act of March 3, 1875, c. 137, § 5, 18 Stat.,470, 472; Josslyn v. Phillips, 27 Fed. 481; Mansfield, Coldwater & Lake Michigan Ry. Co. v. Swan, 111 U. S. 379; Mattingly…
-
Bradstreet Co. v. Higgins, 114 U.S. 262 (U.S. 1885)…tiff in error. • It has been often decided that if a suit is dismissed for want of jurisdiction in this court no judgment for the costs of the suit can be given. Inglee v. Coolidge, 2 Wheat. 363; McIver v. Wattles, 9 Wheat: 650 ; Strader v. Graham, 18 How. 602; Hornthall v. Collector, 9 Wall. 560. A different rule prevails [*264] when there has been á reversal here because the Circuit Court did not have jurisdiction, as this court has authority to correct the error of the Circuit Court in taking jurisdict…