THE UNITED STATES, APPELLANTS,
v.
DANIEL W. COXE AND OTHERS
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Supreme Court reversed a district court decree in a case brought by the United States against Daniel W. Coxe and others, finding that the case was indistinguishable from two prior precedents (United States v. King and United States v. Turner's Heirs) and therefore remanding the matter with instructions to dismiss the petition.
© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Mr. Chief Justice TANEY delivered the opinion of the court. This case cannot be distinguished from the case of United States v. King et al. 7 How. 833, and of United States v. Turner’s Heirs, 11 How. 663.
The decree of the district court must therefore be reversed, and a mandate issued to the court, below to dismiss “the petition.
Order. This cause came on to be heard, on the transcript of the record, from the district court of the United States-for the eastern district, of Louisiana;, and it appearing to the court that this case cannot be distinguished from the case of the United States v. King et al. 7 How. 833, and of the United States v. Turner’s Heirs, 11 How. 663, it is thereupon now here ordered, adjudged, and decreed by this court, that the decree of the said district court in this cause be, and the same is hereby, reversed and annulled, and.that this cause be, and the same is hereby, remanded to the said district court, with directions to dismiss the petition.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- The United States v. King, 7 How. 833 (U.S. 1849)
- The United States v. Turner, 11 How. 663 (U.S. 1850)