KELECHI AJOKU, PETITIONER,

v.

UNITED STATES.

Citator

Cited By

• Heien v. North Carolina., 135 S. Ct. 530 (U.S. 2014)
  …hose arguments and affirmed the trial court's denial of his motion to suppress. --- N.C.App. ----, 741 S.E.2d 1 (2013). The North Carolina Supreme Court affirmed in turn. 367 N.C. 163, 749 S.E.2d 278 (2013). We granted certiorari. 572 U.S. ----, 134 S.Ct. 1872, 188 L.Ed.2d 910 (2014). II The Fourth Amendment provides: "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upo…
• Jones v. Waffle House, Inc., 866 F.3d 1257 (11th Cir. 2017)
  …g] the courts to -examine and, to a limited extent, construe the underlying agreement,” InterDigital Commc’ns, LLC v. Int’l Trade Comm’n, 718 F. 3d 1336, 1347 (Fed. Cir. 2013) (quotations omitted), vac’d on other grounds by — U.S. —, 134 S.Ct. 1876, 188 L.Ed.2d 905 (2014), as the wholly groundless exception does, runs counter to the Supreme Court’s mandate. Either the parties have evinced an intent to arbitrate gateway issues, or they have not. It’s not for the courts to say the parties really didn’t mean to d…
• Azar v. Rochelle Garza ad litem to unaccompanied minor J.D., 138 S. Ct. 1790 (U.S. 2018)
  …ot every moot case will warrant vacatur, the fact that the relevant claim here became moot before certiorari does not limit this Court's discretion. See, e.g., LG Electronics, Inc. v. InterDigital Communications, LLC, 572 U.S. ----, 134 S.Ct. 1876, 188 L.Ed.2d 905 (2014) (after the certiorari petition was filed, respondents withdrew the complaint they filed with the International Trade Commission); United States v. Samish Indian Nation, 568 U.S. 936, 133 S.Ct. 423, 184 L.Ed.2d 253 (2012) (after the certiorari…