THE FIRST NATIONAL BANK AT ORLANDO
v.
R. L. WILLIAMS

Fla. | 1940-02-20
Terrell, C. J., Whitfield, Brown, Buford, Chapman and Ti-iomas, J. J., concur.-
142 Fla. 401 Florida Supreme Court (1940)
Also reported at: 195 So. 411

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The Florida Supreme Court affirmed a lower court's decree because the justices were equally divided on whether to affirm or reverse, a situation where the court's precedent dictates affirmation.


Holding

When the members of the Supreme Court, sitting as a full body, are permanently and equally divided in opinion as to whether a decree should be affirmed or reversed, and there is no prospect of an immediate change in the court's personnel, the decree should be affirmed.


Key Quotes

“When the members of the Supreme Court sitting six members in a body and after full consultation, it appears that the members of the Court are permanently and equally divided in opinion as to whether the decree should be affirmed or reversed, and there is no prospect of an immediate change in the personnel of the Court, the decree should be affirmed”

Establishes the rule for affirming a decree when the court is equally divided.

Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

The case involved an appeal of a circuit court decree. The seven justices of the Florida Supreme Court were equally divided, with three voting to reve…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

In this cause Mr. Chief Justice Terrell, Mr. Justice Whitfield and Mr. Justice Buford are of the opinion that the decree in this cause should be reversed while Mr. Justice Brown, Mr. Justice Chapman and Mr. Justice Thomas are of the opinion that the said decree should be affirmed. When the members of the Supreme Court sitting six members in a body and after full consultation, it appears that the members of the Court are *402permanently and equally divided in opinion as to whether the decree should be affirmed or reversed, and there is no prospect of an immediate change in the personnel of the Court, the decree should be affirmed; therefore it is considered, ordered and decreed under the authority of State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 So. R. 51, that the decree of the circuit court in this cause be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., Whitfield, Brown, Buford, Chapman and Ti-iomas, J. J., concur.-


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw