DON EARL PRICE, PETITIONER,
v.
TEXAS.

U.S. | 2014-03-24
No. 13–8253.
134 S. Ct. 1547 Supreme Court of the United States (2014) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 188 L. Ed. 2d 565 · 572 U.S. 1020 · 82 U.S.L.W. 3550
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Cannon v. State, 180 So. 3d 1023 (Fla. 2015)
    …y of the evidence against him or not, this Court has a mandatory obligation to independently determine whether there was sufficient evidence to- sustain the jury’s verdict. See Kalisz v. State, 124 So. 3d 185, 214 (Fla.2013), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 134 S.Ct. 1547, 188 L.Ed.2d 565 (2014); Wheeler v. State, 4 So. 3d 599, 605 (Fla.2009). “Whether the evidence is sufficient is judged by whether it is competent and substantial.” Phillips v. State, 39 So. 3d 296, 308 (Fla.2010). However, if the State’s evidence o…
  • Jordan v. State, 176 So. 3d 920 (Fla. 2015)
    …is due process rights and section 921.141(7), Florida Statutes. We disagree. “A trial court’s decision to admit victim impact testimony is reviewed for an abuse of discretion.” Kalisz v. State, 124 So. 3d 185, 211 (Fla.2013), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 134 S.Ct. 1547, 188 L.Ed.2d 565 (2014). We have stated the following with regard to the use of. victim .impact statements and their admissibility: In Payne v. Tennessee, 501 U.S. 808, 111 S.Ct. 2597, 115 L.Ed.2d 720 (1991), the United- States Supreme Court held t…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw