IN THE MATTER OF STANLEY M. CHESLEY.
IN THE MATTER OF STANLEY M. CHESLEY.
134 S. Ct. 677
Supreme Court of the United States (2013)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 187 L. Ed. 2d 465 · 571 U.S. 1021
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Wood v. Moss, 134 S. Ct. 2056 (U.S. 2014)…onstitutional violation clearly established. Over the dissent of eight judges, the Ninth Circuit denied the en banc petition. See 711 F. 3d, at 947 (O'Scannlain, J., dissenting from denial of rehearing en banc). We granted certiorari. 571 U.S. ----, 134 S.Ct. 677, 187 L.Ed.2d 544 (2013). II A It is uncontested and uncontestable that government officials may not exclude from public places persons engaged in [*757] peaceful expressive activity solely because the government actor fears, dislikes, or disagree…
-
Ruthelle Frank v. Walker, 135 S. Ct. 7 (U.S. 2014)…not vacate a stay entered by a court of appeals unless that court clearly and 'demonstrably' erred in its application of 'accepted standards.' " Planned Parenthood of Greater Tex. Surgical Health Servs. v. Abbott, 571 U.S. ----, 134 S.Ct. 506, 506, 187 L.Ed.2d 465 (2013)(SCALIA, J., concurring in denial of application to vacate stay) (quoting Western Airlines, Inc. v. Teamsters, 480 U.S. 1301, 1305, 107 S.Ct. 1515, 94 L.Ed.2d 744, (1987)(O'Connor, J., in chambers); some internal quotation marks omitted). Unde…