WALTER J. DOLAN, SR.,
v.
RENUART LUMBER YARDS, INC.

Fla. | 1940-03-05
Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Chapman, J. J., concur., Thomas, J., concurs in opinion and judgment., Justices Terrell and Buford not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.
142 Fla. 205 Florida Supreme Court (1940) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 194 So. 483
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

*206Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Chapman, J. J., concur.

Thomas, J., concurs in opinion and judgment.

Justices Terrell and Buford not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Cumbie v. State, 156 Fla. 779 (Fla. 1945)
    …e the crime, then, and under these conditions and circumstances, it becomes the duty of the Court to reverse the cause for a new trial.” See also in this connection Fabal v. State, 104 Fla. 293, 139 So. 829 and Redmon et al. v. State, 142 Fla. 206, 194 So. 483. Applying these principles to this case, my conclusion is that the ends of justice would be best subserved by a reversal of the judgment with instructions to grant the motion for a new trial. CHAPMAN, C. J., and THOMAS, J., concur.…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw