IN RE STATE ATTORNEY'S INVESTIGATION SUBPOENAE, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. STATE
v.
TURNER; NANCY GILLIAM ET AL., APPELLANTS, V. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE; ANTONIO LOPEZ AND RONALD C. HALLUM, APPELLANTS, V. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1972-10-13
Nos. 72-693, 72-741
HOBSON, A. C. J., and MANN and Mc-NULTY, JJ., concur.
267 So. 2d 661 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1972) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See opinion of his court on Motion for Order Dissolving Stay 1972 in 267 So.2d 658, as styled above, and cases cited therein, especially In Re Petition of Specter, 1970, 439 Pa. 404, 268 A.2d 104 and Zicarelli v. New Jersey Commission of Investigation, 1970, 55 N.J. 249, 261 A.2d 129, affirmed 1972, 406 U.S. 472, 92 S.Ct. 1670, 32 L.Ed.2d 234.

HOBSON, A. C. J., and MANN and Mc-NULTY, JJ., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Gilliam v. State, 268 So. 2d 379 (Fla. 1972)
    …PER CURIAM. Petitioners seek by conflict certiorari to have reviewed in this Court a decision by the District Court of Appeal, Second District, Fla.App., 267 So. 2d 661, which affirmed a decision of the Circuit Court in and for Pinellas County, Florida, committing them to jail on a charge of contempt for refusing to answer certain questions, notwithstanding their claiming the benefits of the fifth amendment to the…
  • Brookins v. State, 343 So. 2d 96 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977)
    …ce at the time of the sale. Based on the record before us, we find that the appellant’s arguments are without merit. See State v. Sebastian, 171 So. 2d 893 (Fla.1965). See also Singleton v. State, 315 So. 2d 506 (Fla.3d DCA 1975); Dilberth v. State, 267 So. 2d 661 (Fla.3d DCA 1972); and Hargrett v. State, 255 So. 2d 298 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971). Affirmed.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw