COALITION FOR THE PROTECTION OF MARRIAGE, PETITIONER,
v.
BEVERLY SEVCIK, ET AL.

U.S. | 2013-06-27
No. 12–689.
570 U.S. 932 Supreme Court of the United States (2013) Negative Treatment
Also reported at: 186 L. Ed. 2d 934 · 133 S. Ct. 2885
Cited by 5 cases
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Daniel v. United States, 139 S. Ct. 1713 (U.S. 2019)
    …oner now asks the Court to reconsider Feres . I have explained before that " ' Feres was wrongly decided and heartily deserves the widespread, almost universal criticism it has received.' " Lanus v. United States , 570 U.S. 932, 933, 133 S.Ct. 2731, 186 L.Ed.2d 934 (2013) (quoting United States v. Johnson , 481 U.S. 681, 700, 107 S.Ct. 2063, 95 L.Ed.2d 648 (1987) (Scalia, J., dissenting)). I write again to point out the unintended consequences of this Court's refusal to revisit Feres . Earlier this Term, in…
    1 / 2
  • Whitton v. Dixon (U.S. 2026)

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw