NICHOLAS PERA
v.
EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF NEVADA, CLARK COUNTY, ET AL.
NICHOLAS PERA
EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF NEVADA, CLARK COUNTY, ET AL.
569 U.S. 1028
Supreme Court of the United States (2013)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 186 L. Ed. 2d 858 · 133 S. Ct. 2823
Cited by 1 case
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hendrix v. State, 136 So. 3d 1122 (Fla. 2014)…reasoning.” Hendrix, 908 So. 2d at 428. Claims raised and rejected in prior postconviction proceedings are procedurally barred from being relitigated in a successive motion. See Van Poyck v. State, 116 So. 3d 347, 362 (Fla.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 2823, 186 L.Ed.2d 881 (2013). Accordingly, the circuit court properly found these claims procedurally barred. C. Brady Third, Hendrix argues that the State committed a violation of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963), b…