JIMMIE CRAIG DANIELS, PETITIONER,
v.
MICHAEL SEPANAK, WARDEN.
JIMMIE CRAIG DANIELS, PETITIONER,
MICHAEL SEPANAK, WARDEN.
569 U.S. 1001
Supreme Court of the United States (2013)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 185 L. Ed. 2d 1117 · 133 S. Ct. 2402
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Wright v. Sec'y, Fla. Dep't OF Corr., Attorney Gen., State of Fla., 761 F.3d 1256 (11th Cir. 2014)…or sharpen a general principle of Supreme Court jurisprudence into a specific legal rule that [the Supreme Court] has not announced.” Marshall v. Rodgers, 569 U.S. -, -, 133 S.Ct. 1446, 1450, 185 L.Ed.2d 540, reh’g denied, - U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 2408, 185 L.Ed.2d 1117 (2013). Also, a circuit court “may not canvass circuit decisions to determine whether a particular rule of law is so widely accepted among the Federal Circuits that it would, if presented to [the Supreme Court], be accepted as correct.” Id. at 145…
-
Sonny Desposito v. United States, 134 S. Ct. 2749 (U.S. 2014)