S. P. SNYDER & SON, INC., ETC. AND BYRON F. SNYDER, PETITIONERS,

v.

GRANT W. TRUNDEL, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By

• ST. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. & Robert Martin v. White, 369 So. 2d 1007 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979)
  …t’s instruction recommended as mandatory the placement of railroad-highway crossing signs (crossbuck) at all crossings.1 [*1011] In our earlier opinion in St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Company v. Burlison, 262 So. 2d 280 (Fla.App.1972), cert. den. 266 So. 2d 350 (Fla.1972), this Court considered and rejected the railroad’s argument regarding the admissibility of industry standards, stating: “The evidence adduced concerning recommended signalization and defendant’s failure to provide the recommended signali…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Dorsey v. State, 298 So. 2d 486 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974)
  …[*487] PER CURIAM. Affirmed on authority of Willcox v. State, Fla.App.2nd, 1972, 258 So. 2d 298, cert. den., Fla., 266 So. 2d 350, and Johnson v. State, Fla.1971, 252 So. 2d 361. HOBSON, Acting C. J., and BOARD-MAN and GRIMES, JJ., concur.…
• Mrs. Jessie Mae Young v. Ill. Cent. Gulf R.R. Co., 618 F.2d 332 (5th Cir. 1980)
  …asonable standard of due care should not be received as evidence of negligence. See St. Louis-San Francisco Railway v. White, 369 So. 2d 1007, 1011 (Fla.App.1979); St. Louis-San Francisco Railway v. Burlison, 262 So. 2d 280 (Fla.App.), cert. denied, 266 So. 2d 350 (Fla.1972); see also 30 Ala.L.Rev. 20, 43 (1978). It should have been admitted for that purpose. The court erred in failing to so admit it. The trial court also excluded evidence of two prior collisions between defendant’s train and vehicles at thi…

Authorities Cited

• Evans v. Biggs, 262 So. 2d 486 (Fla. 2d DCA 1972)
• S. P. Snyder & Sons, Inc. v. Trundle, 262 So. 2d 486 (Fla. 4th DCA 1972)