THE SECOND NATIONAL BANK OF NORTH MIAMI, PETITIONER,
v.
HANNAN SOUTH CONSTRUCTION, INC., AND THE HANNAN COMPANY, RESPONDENTS
THE SECOND NATIONAL BANK OF NORTH MIAMI, PETITIONER,
HANNAN SOUTH CONSTRUCTION, INC., AND THE HANNAN COMPANY, RESPONDENTS
265 So. 2d 372
Florida Supreme Court (1972)
Caution
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
Certiorari denied. 260 So.2d 533.
ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Baker v. State, 336 So. 2d 364 (Fla. 1976)…722 (1941). State v. Strickland, 172 So. 2d 260 (Fla.App.2d 1965). Only very rarely should the trial court’s determination be disturbed, see Hicks v. State, 127 Fla. 669, 173 So. 815 (1937); Solis v. State, 262 So. 2d 9 (Fla.App.2d 1972) cert. den., 265 So. 2d 372 (Fla.1972); Douth v. State, supra, and especially is this so if the trial court grants a new trial in a criminal case on the basis of newly discovered evidence, because “[c]ourts . . . are sometimes indulgent in their requirements as to a showing of…
-
Thomas v. Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co., 424 So. 2d 36 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)…) must establish that the insurer’s conduct amounted to either bad faith or fraud. Central National Insurance Co. v. Gonzalez, 295 So. 2d 694 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974); Welborn v. American Liberty Insurance Co., 260 So. 2d 229 (Fla. 1st DCA), cert. denied, 265 So. 2d 372 (Fla.1972). Each case is to be determined on its own facts, and the question of the insurer’s failure to act in good faith with due regard for the interests of the insured is for the jury. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Davis, 412 F. 2d 475 (5th Ci…
-
Williams v. State, 582 So. 2d 143 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991)…ence “would probably have changed the verdict,” applies to prejudgment motions for new trial pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.600. Freeman v. State, 547 So. 2d 125 (Fla.1989); Solis v. State, 262 So. 2d 9 (Fla. 2d DCA), cert. denied, 265 So. 2d 372 (Fla.1972). However, even applying this more lenient standard the trial court has broad discretion to determine the credibility of allegedly recanted testimony. Mollica v. State, 374 So. 2d 1022 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979), cert. denied, 386 So. 2d 639 (Fla.…
Authorities Cited
- Passacantilli v. Chrysler Leasing Corp., 260 So. 2d 533 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972)
- The Second Nat'l Bank of N. Miami v. Hannan S. Constr. Inc., 260 So. 2d 533 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972)