DURR
v.
ILLINOIS

U.S. | 2012-10-09
No. 12-5583
568 U.S. 947 Supreme Court of the United States (2012) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Hutchinson v. State, 243 So. 3d 880 (Fla. 2018)
    …rt dismissed the amended petition as untimely. Hutchinson v. Florida , No. 5:09-CV-261-R5, 2010 WL 3833921 (N.D. Fla. Sept. 28, 2010). The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed. Hutchinson v. Florida , 677 F. 3d 1097 (11th Cir.), cert. denied , 568 U.S. 947, 133 S.Ct. 435, 184 L.Ed.2d 266 (2012). Hutchinson filed a rule 60(b) motion to reopen his federal habeas case pro se. The federal district court assigned the capital habeas unit (CHU) as federal habeas counsel of record. This motion remains pending…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw