ISIAH HINES, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1972-05-19
No. 71-437
HOBSON, Acting C. J., and MANN and McNULTY, JJ., concur.
262 So. 2d 236 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1972) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on authority of Steinhauser v. State, Fla.App.2d 1969, 228 So.2d 446.

HOBSON, Acting C. J., and MANN and McNULTY, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • City OF Daytona Beach Shores v. State, 483 So. 2d 405 (Fla. 1985)
    …gustine Beach. The City of Daytona Beach Shores seeks review of the Fifth District Court of Appeal’s decision in City of Daytona Beach Shores v. State, 454 So. 2d 651 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984), which we find conflicts with Nichols v. City of Jacksonville, 262 So. 2d 236 (Fla. 1st DCA 1972). In County of St. Johns v. Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund, No. 85-279, the Fifth District Court of Appeal certified the trial court judgment as being of great public importance requiring immediate resolu…
  • City OF Daytona Beach Shores v. State, 454 So. 2d 651 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984)
    …o cannot be considered a valid exercise of the city’s regulatory powers because it represents a purely revenue raising measure for underwriting various governmental activities and, as such, is not regulation. But see Nichols v. City of Jacksonville, 262 So. 2d 236 (Fla. 1st DCA [*655] 1972) (imposition of a toll to control vehicular traffic was held to be valid exercise of city’s regulatory power). If the ordinance only sought to regulate and police vehicular traffic rather than imposing a user charge for veh…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw