SAIN
v.
SNYDER ET AL.; VENEZIA V. WILLIAM PENN SCHOOL DISTRICT; JONES V. ANHEUSER BUSCH; YOUNG V. CARGILL; WALSH-FAUCHER V. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE; SPEAR V. GENERAL MOTORS CORP.; SCHULTZ V. HALPIN ET AL.; JAIYEOLA V. CARRIER CORP., IN RE COX, YSAIS V. NEW MEXICO ET AL.; DAVIS V. BOOKER, WARDEN; BAKER V. KENTUCKY; DACOSTA V. UNION LOCAL 306 OF THE MOTION PICTURE PROJECTIONISTS, OPERATORS, VIDEO TECHNICIANS, THEATRICAL EMPLOYEES & ALLIED CRAFTS, ET AL., IN RE DANIEL, JOHNSON V. LIVINGSTON, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, ET AL.; STUDLI V. CRIMONE ET AL.; FORD V. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; DENNIS V. CITY OF AVENTURA, FLORIDA, ET AL.; ADIR V. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA, ET AL.; DUTCH V. BALICKI, ADMINISTRATOR, SOUTH WOODS STATE PRISON, ET AL.; DOUGLAS V. MICHIGAN; MEHRA V. CONTINENTAL CASUALTY CO. ET AL.; AND MEHRA V. SAEIAN ET AL.; HONESTO V. CALIFORNIA ET AL.; WILLIAMS V. CROUCH ET AL.; AVANT V. LOS ANGELES CENTRAL COMMUNITY POLICE STATION ET AL.; MONIZ V. MCKEE, WARDEN; MCKINNEDY V. SOUTH CAROLINA; BLAKELY V. SNIVELY ET AL.; PEARSON V. BRACE ET AL.; ANDERSON V. CASTILLO, WARDEN; JACKSON V. RUSSO, SUPERINTENDENT, SOUZA-BARANOWSKI CORRECTIONAL CENTER; YSAIS V. RICHARDSON ET AL.; APPUKKUTTA V. NEW YORK; DILLON V. SAN FRANCISCO VETERANS ADMINISTRATION, FORT MILEY HOSPITAL; FULTON V. UNITED STATES; JOHNSON V. OBAMA, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES; BASSO V. THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION; BREWER V. VIRGINIA; WILLIAMS V. WHITE, WARDEN, ET AL. (TWO JUDGMENTS); WOODARD V. THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION; WALKER V. JARRIEL, WARDEN; CHASE V. MAYNARD, SECRETARY, MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, ET AL.; MACON V. OHIO DEPARTMENT OF JOB AND FAMILY SERVICES; CEMINCHUK V. OBAMA, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES; HARPER V. UNITED STATES; VADDE V. BANK OF AMERICA; MADEJA V. PENNSYLVANIA; CHRISTMAN V. UTICA NATIONAL INSURANCE GROUP, INC.; BAUER V. HOLDER, ATTORNEY GENERAL; MELENDREZ V. BIERY, JUDGE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS, ET AL.; VANNAUSDLE V. PIERCE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ASSIGNED COUNSEL ET AL.; CADY V. THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION; LARSON V. UNITED STATES; CALDERON-LOPEZ V. UNITED STATES; KIM V. UNITED STATES; AHMADZAI V. UNITED STATES, IN RE GAFFNEY, GRAHAM V. MISSOURI; MACKENZIE V. THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION; LANE-EL V. SEVIER, SUPERINTENDENT, MIAMI CORRECTIONAL FACILITY; TEAGUE V. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION; BEY V. I. B. E. W. LOCAL UNION #3 UNION REPRESENTATIVES ET AL.; TURNER V. EDMONDS; BUENROSTRO V. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; CALDERON V. EVERGREEN OWNERS, INC., ET AL.; RUHBAYAN V. UNITED STATES; COHEN V. HUNT, WARDEN; GEORGIEVA V. BARNES & NOBLE; COOK V. MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; ROWELL V. MARTINO ET AL.; COSTA V. MISSOURI; WILLIAMS V. FREE ET AL.; DAVIS V. UNITED STATES

U.S. | 2010-11-29
Nos. 09-1332; No. 09-1464; No. 09-1506; No. 09-1558; No. 09-1566; No. 09-1579; No. 09-8375; No. 09-9986; No. 09-10533; No. 09-10544; No. 09-10601; No. 09-10615; No. 09-10683; No. 09-10724; No. 09-10742; No. 09-10778; No. 09-10817; No. 09-10893; No. 09-10950; No. 09-10959; No. 09-10982; No. 09-11016; No. 09-11021; No. 09-11089; No. 09-11092; No. 09-11111; No. 09-11137; No. 09-11145; No. 09-11164; No. 09-11182; No. 09-11198; No. 09-11225; No. 09-11251; No. 09-11256; No. 09-11288; No. 09-11306; No. 09-11336; No. 09-11371; No. 09-11377; No. 09-11387; No. 09-11430; No. 09-11526; No. 10-25; No. 10-32; No. 10-65; No. 10-112; No. 10-138; No. 10-139; No. 10-197; No. 10-307; No. 10-5089; No. 10-5116; No. 10-5126; No. 10-5170; No. 10-5173; No. 10-5233; No. 10-5252; No. 10-5265; No. 10-5389; No. 10-5441; No. 10-5462; No. 10-5561; No. 10-5594; No. 10-5637; No. 10-5643; No. 10-5667; No. 10-5780; No. 10-5791; No. 10-5796; No. 10-5847; No. 10-5880; No. 10-5901; No. 10-6003
562 U.S. 1086 Supreme Court of the United States (2010)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

This is a Supreme Court order listing numerous petitions for certiorari and their disposition. The order does not contain substantive legal analysis but rather reflects the Court's action on a docket of cases spanning various legal areas including criminal justice, administrative law, employment, and constitutional questions.


Headnotes

[1] A petition for rehearing may be denied.

[2] The court may deny petitions for rehearing in multiple consolidated cases.

Previewing 2 of 5 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Opinion of the Court

ante, p. 830; ante, p. 835; ante, p. 837; ante, p. 840; ante, p. 841; ante, p. 841; ante, p. 841; ante, p. 843; ante, p. 826; ante, p. 846; ante, p. 847; ante, p. 847; ante, p. 849; ante, p. 826; ante, p. 851; ante, p. 851; ante, p. 853; ante, p. 855; ante, p. 857; No. 09-10959. No. 09-10982. No. 09-11016. No. 09-11021. No. 09-11089. No. 09-11092. No. 09-11111. No. 09-11137. No. 09-11145. No. 09-11164. No. 09-11182. No. 09-11198. No. 09-11225. No. 09-11251. No. 09-11256. No. 09-11288. No. 09-11306. No. 09-11336. No. 09-11371. No. 09-11377. No. 09-11387. No. 09-11430. No. 09-11526. No. 10-25. No. 10-32. No. 10-65. ante, p. 857; ante, p. 858; ante, p. 859; ante, p. 859; ante, p. 861; ante, p. 861; ante, p. 862; ante, p. 863; ante, p. 864; ante, p. 865; ante, p. 866; ante, p. 867; ante, p. 868; ante, p. 870; ante, p. 870; ante, p. 872; ante, p. 873; ante, p. 874; ante, p. 876; ante, p. 876; ante, p. 877; ante, p. 880; ante, p. 886; ante, p. 890; ante, p. 890; ante, p. 892; No. 10-112. No. 10-138. No. 10-139. No. 10-197. No. 10-307. No. 10-5089. No. 10-5116. No. 10-5126. No. 10-5170. No. 10-5173. No. 10-5233. No. 10-5252. No. 10-5265. No. 10-5389. No. 10-5441. No. 10-5462. No. 10-5561. No. 10-5594. No. 10-5637. No. 10-5643. No. 10-5667. No. 10-5780. No. 10-5791. No. 10-5796. No. 10-5847. ante, p. 894; ante, p. 895; ante, p. 895; ante, p. 897; ante, p. 964; ante-, p. 903; ante, p. 904; ante, p. 905; ante, p. 907; ante, p. 907; ante, p. 953; ante, p. 825; ante, p. 912; ante, p. 919; ante, p. 922; ante, p. 923; ante, p. 929; ante, p. 930; ante, p. 932; ante, p. 933; ante, p. 934; ante, p. 937; ante, p. 967; ante, p. 938; ante, p. 968; No. 10-5880. No. 10-5901. No. 10-6003. ante, p. 983; ante, p. 983; and ante, p. 943. Petitions for rehearing denied.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw