WARNER-LAMBERT CO., LLC, ET AL.
v.
KENT ET AL.
WARNER-LAMBERT CO., LLC, ET AL.
KENT ET AL.
552 U.S. 440
Supreme Court of the United States (2008)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 170 L. Ed. 2d 51 · 128 S. Ct. 1168 · 2008 U.S. LEXIS 2235 · SCDB 2007-023
Cited by 6 cases
Per_curiam
[*441] Per Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.
The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Vreeland v. Ferrer, 71 So. 3d 70 (Fla. 2011)…hin a state’s prerogative to regulate matters of health and safety, which “is a sphere in which the presumption against preemption applies, indeed, stands at its strongest”), ajfd by an equally divided court sub nom. Warner-Lambert Co., LLC v. Kent, 552 U.S. 440, 128 S.Ct. 1168, 170 L.Ed.2d 51 (2008) (per curiam); Abbot v. American Cyanamid Co., 844 F. 2d 1108, 1112 (4th Cir.1988) (“The presumption against preemption is even stronger against preemption of state remedies, like tort recoveries, when no federa…1 / 2
-
In re Trasylol Prods. Liab. Litigation-MDL-1928, 763 F. Supp. 2d 1312 (S.D. Fla. 2010)…ate claims at issue in some settings, 12 the Second Circuit held that it does not. The Second Circuit’s judgment was affirmed by an equally divided Supreme Court. 13 Warner-Lambert Co. v. *1324 Kent, 552 U.S. 440, 128 S.Ct. 1168, 170 L.Ed.2d 51 (2008). According to the Sixth Circuit, although this case presented a somewhat different “legal regime” from the one invalidated in Buckman, 14 the difference between the circumstances presented in Buckman and those at issue wa…1 / 2