DANTZ

v.

AMERICAN APPLE GROUP, LLC

Citator

Cited By

• Woodford v. NGO, 548 U.S. 81 (U.S. 2006)
  …002); Ross v. County of Bernalillo, 365 F. 3d 1181, 1185-1186 (CA10 2004) (same); Spruill v. Gillis, 372 F. 3d 218, 230 (CA3 2004) (same); Johnson v. Meadows, 418 F. 3d 1152, 1159 (CA11 2005) (same). We granted certiorari to address this conflict, 546 U. S. 1015 (2005), and we now reverse. II A The PLRA provides as follows: “No action shall be brought with respect to prison conditions under section 1983 of this title, or any other [*88] Federal law, by a prisoner confined in any jail, prison, or other c…
• Beard v. Banks, 548 U.S. 521 (U.S. 2006)
  …rity of the panel held that the prison regulation “cannot be supported as a matter of law by the record in this case.” Id., at 148; see also infra, at 536. The Secretary sought our review of the appeals court’s judgment, and we granted his petition. 546 U. S. 1015 (2005). II Turner v. Safley, 482 U. S. 78 (1987), and Overton v. Bazzetta, 539 U. S. 126 (2003), contain the basic substantive legal standards governing this case. This Court recognized in Turner that imprisonment does not automatically deprive a…