ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONICS LTD.

v.

PHILIPS DOMESTIC APPLIANCES AND PERSONAL CARE B. V. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• House v. Bell, 547 U.S. 518 (U.S. 2006)
  …urder mystery, an authentic ‘who-done-it’ where the wrong man may be executed.” Id., at 709 (opinion of Gilman, J.). He concluded such grave uncertainty necessitated relief in the form of a new trial for House. Id., at 710. We granted certiorari, 545 U. S. 1151 (2005), and now reverse. IV As a general rule, claims forfeited under state law may support federal habeas relief only if the prisoner demonstrates cause for the default and prejudice from the asserted error. See Murray v. Carrier, 477 U. S. 478,…
• Rice v. Collins, 546 U.S. 333 (U.S. 2006)
  …ed to rehear the case en banc, id., at 670-673. Though it recited the proper standard of review, the panel majority improperly substituted its evaluation of the record for that of the state [*338] trial court. We granted the petition for certiorari, 545 U. S. 1151 (2005), and now reverse. A defendant’s Batson challenge to a peremptory strike requires a three-step inquiry. First, the trial court must determine whether the defendant has made a prima facie showing that the prosecutor exercised a peremptory cha…