IN RE ESTATE OF ETHEL FEIN, DECEASED

Citator

Cited By

• Odom v. State, 403 So. 2d 936 (Fla. 1981)
  …g the defendant rather than impeaching the witness. Assuming, however, that there was a violation of the rule, the question that then arose before the court below was how to remedy it. This was a matter for the court’s discretion. Rollins v. State, 256 So. 2d 541 (Fla.4th DCA 1972). The court made an inquiry into the circumstances of the conversation and issued a ruling which we find to have been not only within the range of discretion, but eminently fair and reasonable. D. Appellant contends that the tria…
• DEL Monte Banana Co. & Fed. Transp., Inc. v. Chacon, 466 So. 2d 1167 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)
  …d proceed with no further mention of the matter. If, on the other hand, the trial judge finds the rule has been violated, it is within his sound judicial discretion to determine how to remedy the violation. Odom, 403 So. 2d at 941; Rollins v. State, 256 So. 2d 541 (Fla. 4th DCA 1972). See also Romano v. Palazzo, 83 Fla. 243, 91 So. 115 (1922). The remedy can range from not permitting the witness to testify at all to allowing cross-examination on the matter as bearing on the witness’s credibility. But see Stei…
• Frierson v. State, 303 So. 2d 698 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974)
  …a.App.1965, 175 So. 2d 82; Baisden v. State, Fla.App.1967, 203 So. 2d 194; Shif-rin v. State, Fla.App.1968, 210 So. 2d 18; Lister v. State, Fla.App. 1969, 226 So. 2d 238; Staten v. State, Fla.App.1971, 248 So. 2d 697; Rollins v. State, Fla.App.1972, 256 So. 2d 541; Skold v. State, Fla.App. 1972, 263 So. 2d 627; United States v. Cooper, 5th Cir. 1973, 472 F. 2d 64; § 924.-33, Fla.Stat.…