D. L., INDIVIDUALLY, AS NEXT FRIEND OF J. L., AND AS ADMINISTRATRIX OF ESTATE OF R. L., ET AL.
v.
UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 497, DOUGLAS COUNTY, KANSAS, ET AL.
D. L., INDIVIDUALLY, AS NEXT FRIEND OF J. L., AND AS ADMINISTRATRIX OF ESTATE OF R. L., ET AL.
UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 497, DOUGLAS COUNTY, KANSAS, ET AL.
544 U.S. 1050
Supreme Court of the United States (2005)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Quawn M. Franklin v. State, 965 So. 2d 79 (Fla. 2007)…. State, 152 S.W. 3d 105, 114 (Tex. Crim.App.2004) (holding that a codefen-dant’s spontaneous statements to two different third-party acquaintances were not testimonial because they were casual, spontaneous “street corner” statements), cert. denied, 544 U.S. 1050, 125 S.Ct. 2295, 161 L.Ed.2d 1092 (2005); State v. Manuel, 281 Wis.2d 554, 697 N.W. 2d 811, 824 (2005) (holding that a statement made by a declarant to his girlMend in their apartment implicating the defendant in a murder was not testimonial). In fa…
-
Dimy Paraison v. State, 980 So. 2d 1134 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008)…v. State, 152 S.W. 3d 105, 114 (Tex.Crim.App.2004) (holding that a codefendant’s spontaneous statements to two different third-party acquaintances were not testimonial because they were casual, spontaneous “street corner” statements), cert. denied, 544 U.S. 1050, 125 S.Ct. 2295, 161 L.Ed.2d 1092 (2005); State v. Manuel, 281 Wis.2d 554, 697 N.W. 2d 811, 824 (2005) (holding that a statement made by a declarant to his girlfriend in their apartment implicating the defendant in a murder was not testimonial). In…