BILLINGSLEA
v.
UNITED STATES; JOYNER V. UNITED STATES; SCOTT V. UNITED STATES; ALCORN V. UNITED STATES; ALVARADO V. UNITED STATES; NAVA RIVAS V. UNITED STATES; VAZQUEZ-MOLINA V. UNITED STATES; MCGUIRE V. UNITED STATES; GARCIA V. UNITED STATES; HELTON V. UNITED STATES; GOMEZ-MORALES V. UNITED STATES; LOWRY V. UNITED STATES; MADRAZO-CONSTANTE V. UNITED STATES; BAUTISTA-SANCHEZ V. UNITED STATES; CHAPPELL V. UNITED STATES; HOLLYWOOD V. UNITED STATES; VITELA V. UNITED STATES; LARSON V. UNITED STATES; BROWN V. UNITED STATES; TRASVINA ALVAREZ V. UNITED STATES; ELVE V. UNITED STATES; HICKS V. UNITED STATES

U.S. | 2005-03-28
Nos. 04-7231; No. 04-8657; No. 04-8659; No. 04-8667; No. 04-8670; No. 04-8678; No. 04-8686; No. 04-8709; No. 04-8713; No. 04-8714; No. 04-8715; No. 04-8722; No. 04-8724; No. 04-8726; No. 04-8728; No. 04-8732; No. 04-8744; No. 04-8751; No. 04-8761; No. 04-8768; No. 04-8775; No. 04-8881
544 U.S. 946 Supreme Court of the United States (2005)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The Supreme Court granted petitions for certiorari in twenty-two consolidated cases involving federal criminal convictions and vacated the appellate court judgments, remanding the cases for reconsideration in light of United States v. Booker, which addressed the constitutional validity of mandatory federal sentencing guidelines.

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Opinion of the Court

C. A. 11th Cir.; C. A. 6th Cir. Reported below: 105 Fed. Appx. 811; C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 112 Fed. Appx. 965; C. A. 9th Cir. Reported below: 116 Fed. Appx. 119; C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 111 Fed. Appx. 311; C. A. 9th Cir. Reported below: 111 Fed. Appx. 505; C. A. 1st Cir. Reported below: 389 F. 3d 54; C. A. 1st Cir. Reported below: 389 F. 3d 225; C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 112 Fed. Appx. 991; C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 115 Fed. Appx. 687; C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 117 Fed. Appx. 334; C. A. 4th Cir. Reported below: 116 Fed. Appx. 446; C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 111 Fed. Appx. 283; C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 116 Fed. Appx. 512; C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 113 Fed. Appx. 643; C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 117 Fed. Appx. 905; C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 112 Fed. Appx. 991; C. A. 9th Cir. Reported below: 122 Fed. Appx. 301; C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 101 Fed. Appx. 522; No. 04-8768. No. 04-8775.

No. 04-8881.

C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 116 Fed. Appx. 863; C. A. 6th Cir. Reported below: 115 Fed. Appx. 310; and C. A. 6th Cir. Reported below: 110 Fed. Appx.

600. Motions of petitioners for leave to proceed informa pauperis granted. Certiorari granted, judgments vacated, and cases remanded for further consideration in light of United States v. Booker, 543 U. S. 220 (2005).

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw