NORMAN P. FREEDMAN, APPELLANT,
v.
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF HOLLYWOOD, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Appeal For Delay cases and more on FLexlaw
This case is before the court on appel-lee’s motion to quash or dismiss the appeal on the ground that it is frivolous and taken only for the purpose of delay.
The motion of appellee is denied, oral argument dispensed with, and the appeal is considered on its merits. Our review of the brief filed by appellant convinces us that the only substantial points presented for decision raise issues of law which have heretofore been resolved against appellant by this court’s decision on the question certified to it in this case by the Circuit Court of the Fourth Judicial Circuit.1 The remaining points urged by appellant are without substantial merit and do not warrant reversal of the challenged judgment.
Affirmed.
CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON and RAWLS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Freedman v. First Nat'l Bank OF Hollywood, 255 So. 2d 710 (Fla. 1st DCA 1971)…PER CURIAM. The motion to quash or dismiss this appeal is denied and the judgment affirmed on the authority of the decision this day rendered in the companion case of Freedman v. First National Bank of Hollywood, 255 So. 2d 709. CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON and RAWLS, JJ., concur.…
Authorities Cited
- First Nat'l Bank OF Hollywood v. Freedman, 244 So. 2d 183 (Fla. 1st DCA 1971)