C. E. MILLS, D/B/A MILLS AUCTION MARKET, APPELLANT,
v.
THE COMMERCIAL BANK & TRUST COMPANY OF OCALA, A FLORIDA BANKING CORPORATION, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1971-12-02
No. N-96
SPECTOR, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K. and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.
255 So. 2d 532 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1971)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

An auctioneer who sells mortgaged cattle at the mortgagor's request without the mortgagee's consent is liable to the mortgagee for conversion, even when acting in good faith and without knowledge of the mortgage's existence.


Holding

The auctioneer is liable to the mortgagee for conversion. An auctioneer who sells property for a principal having no title thereto is personally liable to the true owner regardless of good faith or lack of notice, and this rule applies to sales of mortgaged goods at the mortgagor's instance.


Headnotes

[1] An auctioneer who sells mortgaged property for the mortgagor without the mortgagee's consent is liable to the mortgagee for conversion if the mortgage has been recorded.

[2] An auctioneer selling property for a principal who lacks title is personally liable to the true owner for conversion, even if the auctioneer acted in good faith and witho…

Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“An auctioneer who sells property in behalf of a principal having no title thereto is personally liable to the true owner for conversion, regardless of whether he had notice of the true owner's title, or whether he acted with the utmost good faith in total ignorance thereof”

Establishes the bright-line rule that an auctioneer's good faith and lack of notice provide no defense to conversion liability

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Appellant Mills, an auctioneer, sold cattle at auction as agent for the mortgagor. The cattle were subject to a valid and recorded mortgage held by ap…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Final judgment holding that appellant auctioneer is liable to appellee which held a valid and recorded mortgage on some cattle sold by appellant at auction as agent for appellee’s mortgage debtor is in conformity with the majority view on the subject expressed in the following authorities:

15 Am.Jur.2d, Chattel Mortgages, Section 158:

“Although there is some authority to the contrary, the general rule followed by the courts is that an agent, auctioneer, or commission merchant who sells mortgaged property for the mortgagor without the mortgagee’s consent, is liable to the mortgagee for conversion if the mortgage has been recorded.”

7 Am.Jur.2d, Auctions and Auctioneers, Section 68:

“An auctioneer who sells property in behalf of a principal having no title thereto is personally liable to the true owner for conversion, regardless of whether he had notice of the true owner’s title, or whether he acted with the utmost good faith in total ignorance thereof, provided, however, that the true owner has not by his own act or assent given a col- or of title or an apparent right of sale to the party for whom the auctioneer acts. *533The fact that the auctioneer has sold the goods and turned over the proceeds to his principal in innocence and good faith affords him no protection.
“The rule of liability on the part of the auctioneer applies where he innocently sells stolen property; where he sells property in behalf of a vendee under a conditional sale in whom title has not yet vested; where he sells property in behalf of a mortgagee under a void mortgage; and in some cases, where the auctioneer, even though without actual knowledge of the mortgage, sells mortgaged goods at the instance of the mortgagor.”

Affirmed.

SPECTOR, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K. and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw