ROMPILLA

v.

BEARD, SECRETARY, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

Citator

Cited By

• Rompilla v. Beard, 545 U.S. 374 (U.S. 2005)
  …he lawyers’ unreasonable reliance on [*380] family members and medical experts to tell them what records might be useful. The Third Circuit denied rehearing en banc by a vote of 6 to 5. Rompilla v. Horn, 359 F. 3d 310 (2004). We granted certiorari, 542 U. S. 966 (2004), and now reverse.1 II Under 28 U. S. C. § 2254, Rompilla’s entitlement to federal habeas relief turns on showing that the state court’s resolution of his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel under Strickland v. Washington, supra, “res…
• Davis v. Comm'r, Ala. Dep't of Corr., 120 F.4th 768 (11th Cir. 2024)
  …nalysis is not surprising because the Rule 32 trial court issued its decision denying Davis’s Rule 32 petition in August 2004 well before the June 2005 Rompilla decision—indeed, before even the grant of certiorari in Rompilla. See Rompilla v. Beard, 542 U.S. 966 (2004) (granting certiorari). Consequently, the Rule 32 trial court did not have the benefit of the Rompilla decision to define the contours of Davis’s claim—nor did Davis refer to any specific cases, any ABA standards, or other similar state guidel…