HIBBS, DIRECTOR, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE

v.

WINN ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Norfolk S. Ry. Co. v. Kirby, 543 U.S. 14 (U.S. 2004)
  …ility limitation in either bill of lading, the Eleventh Circuit reversed the District Court’s grant of summary judgment for the railroad. We granted certiorari to decide whether Norfolk could take shelter in the liability limitations of either bill, 540 U. S. 1099 (2004), and now reverse. II The courts below appear to have decided this case on an assumption, shared by the parties, that federal rather than state law governs the interpretation of the two bills of lading. Respondents now object. They emphasize…
• Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, 542 U.S. 507 (U.S. 2004)
  …ions, we are satisfied that the Constitution does not entitle him to a searching review of the factual determinations underlying his seizure there.” Ibid. The Fourth Circuit denied rehearing en banc, 337 F. 3d 335 (2003), and we granted certiorari, 540 U. S. 1099 (2004). We now vacate the judgment below and remand. II The threshold question before us is whether the Executive has the authority to detain citizens who qualify as “enemy combatants.” There is some debate as to the proper scope of this term, and…
• Cooper Indus., Inc. v. Aviall Servs., Inc., 543 U.S. 157 (U.S. 2004)
  …asoned in part that “may” in § 113(f)(1) did not mean “may only.” Id., at 686-687. Three members of the en banc court dissented for essentially the reasons given by the panel majority. Id., at 691-693 (opinion of Garza, J.). We granted certiorari, 540 U. S. 1099 (2004), and now reverse. Ill A Section 113(f)(1) does not authorize Aviall’s suit. The first sentence, the enabling clause that establishes the right [*166] of contribution, provides: “Any person may seek contribution . . . during or following an…