ZINN, ALDRICH & CO.,
v.
LOUIS DZIALYNSKI, AND SANDERSON & L'ENGLE VS. LOUIS DZIALYNSKI
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida Supreme Court dismissed an appeal because the necessary records and papers upon which the lower court's order was based were not properly transmitted to the appellate court. Without these essential documents, the court could not review the lower court's decision.
No, the appellate court cannot review an order if the necessary records and papers considered by the lower court are not properly transmitted, as this prevents a satisfactory conclusion on the issues presented.
“We do not find that the records in the actions referred to, or certified copies thereof, have been sent to this court. Without them we cannot come to a satisfactory conclusion upon the questions sought to be presented.”
Explains the lack of necessary documentation for appellate review.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAn order was granted in the lower court directing money held by the sheriff to be paid to a judgment creditor. The appeal was based on this order, but…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Record On Appeal cases and more on FLexlaw
delivered the opinion of thé court..
The order appealed from - purports to have been granted upon an inspection of the records of the court in two actions •referred to, and the answer of the sheriff as to certain mon*eys in his hands. The order directed the money to be paid. to one of the judgment creditors.
We do not find that' the records in the actions referred to,- *44or certified copies thereof, have been sent to this court. Without them we cannot come to a satisfactory conclusion upon the questions sought to be presented. Section 272 of the Code, and Rule IY. of this Court, requiret hat upon an appeal from an order, the return shall consist of a certified copy of the notice of appeal of the order, and of the papers and records upon which the court granted the order. The order appealed from states distinctly what papers and records were considered by the court, and we are therefore advised that we have not a proper return.
We might have directed a proper return to be made, if the certificate to the paper on file here had been sufficient. It merely certifies that “the foregoing are true copies of the original,” &c., and of course does not purport to embrace the necessary papers and records. There is, therefore, nothing upon which to found a certiorari to supply the absent-records.
The only order we can make under the circumstances is to strike the case from the docket. , (See Caulk, adm’r, vs. Fox, 13 Fla., 147.).
Ordered accordingly.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Lovett v. State, 29 Fla. 384 (Fla. 1892)
-
Akin v. Morgan, 50 Fla. 173 (Fla. 1905)…v. Oxford Lake Line, 45 Fla. 275, 34 South. Rep. 893; [*175] Burnham v. Driggers, 44 Fla. 168, 32 South. Rep. 796; The Orange County High School v. Sanford, 17 Fla. 120. See, also, Caulk, Admr. v. Fox, 13 Fla. 147; Zinn, Aldrich & Co. v. Dzialynski, 14 Fla. 43; Rabon v. State, 7 Fla. 9. A motion to vacate the order dismissing the writ of error, to reinstate the cause and to permit the plaintiffs in error to correct, or cause to be corrected, the certificate of the clerk, is made upon the ground that the…
Authorities Cited
- William Caulk cum testamento annexo or Daniel W. Hart v. Samuel W. Fox and Wife, 13 Fla. 147 (Fla. 1869)