EVELYN HERSCHER AND BERNARD HERSCHER, HER HUSBAND, APPELLANTS,
v.
ALBERT ENTERPRISES, INC., ETC., ET AL., APPELLEES
EVELYN HERSCHER AND BERNARD HERSCHER, HER HUSBAND, APPELLANTS,
ALBERT ENTERPRISES, INC., ETC., ET AL., APPELLEES
252 So. 2d 863
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1971)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
The plaintiffs appeal a final judgment entered upon a jury verdict. The points relied upon for reversal all argue claimed procedural errors in the trial of the case or in the court’s handling of the post-trial motions. We hold that prejudicial error does not appear in the record. It has been frequently held that an appellate court will not reverse for a new trial upon procedural errors where it affirmatively appears that the claimed errors did not affect appellant’s right to a fair trial. Hill v. Sadler, Fla.App.1966, 186 So.2d 52.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Herscher v. Albert Enters., Inc., 255 So. 2d 530 (Fla. 1971)…Certiorari denied. 252 So. 2d 863. ROBERTS, C. J., and CARLTON, ADKINS and DEKLE, JJ., concur. ERVIN, J., dissents.…
Authorities Cited
- Hoyt E. Morris and Viola Morris v. Myron M. Kridel, 186 So. 2d 52 (Fla. 4th DCA 1966)