HOWARD
v.
LOUISIANA
HOWARD
LOUISIANA
539 U.S. 931
Supreme Court of the United States (2003)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Windom v. State, 886 So. 2d 915 (Fla. 2004)…So. 2d 409, 431 (Fla.2003) (Pariente, J., concurring in result only); Fotopoulos, 838 So. 2d at 1137 (Pariente, J., concurring in result only); Israel v. State, 837 So. 2d 381, 394 (Fla.2002) (Pariente, J., concurring in result only), cert. denied, 539 U.S. 931, 123 S.Ct. 2582, 156 L.Ed.2d 611 (2003); Doorbal, 837 So. 2d at 964 (Pariente, J., concurring as to the conviction and concurring in result only as to the sentence); Lawrence v. State, 846 So. 2d 440, 456 (Fla.) (Pariente, J., concurring in result o…
-
Hernandez-Alberto v. State, 889 So. 2d 721 (Fla. 2004)…ling on the continuance results in undue prejudice to [the] defendant. This general rule is true even in death penalty cases.” Israel v. State, 837 So. 2d 381, 388 (Fla. 2002) (quoting Kearse v. State, 770 So. 2d 1119, 1127 (Fla.2000), cert. denied, 539 U.S. 931, 123 S.Ct. 2582, 156 L.Ed.2d 611 (2003)). “While death penalty cases command our closest scrutiny, it is still the obligation of an appellate court to review with caution the exercise of experienced discretion by a trial judge in matters such as a m…