ADAMS
v.
CITY OF AUBURN, INDIANA

U.S. | 2003-06-09
No. 02-1342
539 U.S. 914 Supreme Court of the United States (2003) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (U.S. 2004)
    …e statements and makes Sylvia’s statement reliable.” 147 Wash. 2d, at 438-439, 54 P. 3d, at 664 (internal quotation marks omitted).1 We granted certiorari to determine whether the State’s use of Sylvia’s statement violated the Confrontation Clause. 539 U. S. 914 (2003). II The Sixth Amendment’s Confrontation Clause provides that, “[i]n all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right ... to be confronted with the witnesses against him.” We have held that this bedrock procedural guarantee appli…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw