MEADE
v.
DECISIONS OF THE ORPHANS' COURT FOR ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY, MARYLAND, ET AL. (THREE JUDGMENTS)
MEADE
DECISIONS OF THE ORPHANS' COURT FOR ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY, MARYLAND, ET AL. (THREE JUDGMENTS)
538 U.S. 998
Supreme Court of the United States (2003)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Kontrick v. Ryan, 540 U.S. 443 (U.S. 2004)…kruptcy matters and the finality of the bankruptcy court’s decision hardly are fostered by requiring the bankruptcy court to consider the timeliness of an issue that already has adjudicated.” Ibid. We granted whether Rule 4004 is “jurisdictional,”6 538 U. S. 998 (2003), and we now affirm the judgment of the Seventh Circuit.7 Ill Only Congress may determine a subject-matter jurisdiction. U. S. Const., Art. III, §1. [*453] Congress did so with respect to bankruptcy courts in Title 28 (Judiciary and Judicial…