CLACKAMAS GASTROENTEROLOGY ASSOCIATES, P. C.

v.

WELLS

Citator

Cited By

• Virginia v. Hicks, 539 U.S. 113 (U.S. 2003)
  …ized,” allowing her to “prohibit speech that she finds personally distasteful or offensive even though such speech may be protected by the First Amendment.” Id., at 60, 563 S. E. 2d, at 680-681. We granted the Commonwealth’s petition for certiorari. 537 U. S. 1169 (2003). II A Hicks does not contend that he was engaged in constitutionally protected conduct when arrested; nor does he challenge the validity of the trespass statute under which he was convicted. Instead he claims that the RRHA policy barring h…
• Beneficial Nat'l Bank v. Anderson, 539 U.S. 1 (U.S. 2003)
  …ause it could “find no clear congressional intent to permit removal under §§85 and 86.” Id., at 1048. Because this holding conflicted with an Eighth Circuit decision, Krispin [*6] v. May Dept. Stores Co., 218 F. 3d 919 (2000), we granted certiorari. 537 U. S. 1169 (2003). A civil action filed in a state court may be removed to federal court if the claim is one “arising under” federal law. § 1441(b). To determine whether the claim arises under federal law, we examine the “well pleaded” allegations of the comp…