RAYBURN
v.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION; FRIDAY ET UX. V. WHITTLE AND ROPER REAL ESTATE FIRM ET AL.; HILL V. AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSN. ET AL.; GOODIN V. CITY OF JACKSONVILLE ET AL.; HEMPHILL V. MCNEIL-PPC, INC.; MELENDREZ V. SEIB ET AL.; FACE, VIRGINIA COMMISSIONER OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, ET AL. V. NATIONAL HOME EQUITY MORTGAGE ASSN.; GONZALEZ ET UX. V. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT; GONZALEZ ET UX. V. RIDDLE ET AL.; AND GONZALEZ ET UX. V. ELDORADO BANK ET AL.; RASTEN V. BOURNEWOOD HOSPITAL ET AL.; JAMES V. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA; WINKE V. WINKE; BATOR V. HALLOCK ELECTRIC ET AL.; WHIGHAM V. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT ET AL.; LUCAS V. GEORGIA; PAYNE V. WEST VIRGINIA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ET AL.; HAYES V. UNITED STATES; COMPTON V. OREGON; GRIMES V. ANGELONE, DIRECTOR, VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL.; RASTEN V. GOLDBERG ET AL.; THOMAS V. MCLEMORE, WARDEN; GUY V. BARNHART, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY; ARMSTRONG V. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION ET AL.; THIBEAUX V. KLEMAN; MCPHERSON V. GEORGIA; THOMPSON V. MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS ET AL.; RASTEN V. TOWN OF BROOKLINE, MASSACHUSETTS, ET AL.; BRUETMAN V. HERBSTEIN; GIULIANI V. UNITED STATES ET AL.; JOHN STREET LEASEHOLD, LLC V. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION ET AL., IN RE PERRY, KNOX V. POTTER, POSTMASTER GENERAL; WARMBRUN V. SAMSON, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY; BUSBY V. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE; YOUNG V. HUGHS ET AL.; BORTH V. WALKER ET AL.; GONZALEZ ET VIR V. STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA ET AL.; LANGWORTHY V. GOICOCHEA; POTTS V. DEWEESE ET AL.; CONNER V. HEAD, WARDEN; RASTEN V. GELBOND; WHITAKER V. VIRGINIA ET AL., IN RE WOJNICZ, BUFORD V. EMPLOYEES OF SOLANO STATE PRISON ET AL.; KENLEY V. ROPER, SUPERINTENDENT, POTOSI CORRECTIONAL CENTER; JAMES V. UNITED STATES; SHORE V. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP.; GLEBOCKI V. CITY OF CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, ET AL.; WRIGHT V. KEMNA, SUPERINTENDENT, CROSSROADS CORRECTIONAL CENTER; MURDOCK V. MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, IN RE FINK, BURNS V. FLORIDA ET AL.; JARRETT V. ASHCROFT, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ET AL.; DOUGHERTY V. UNITED STATES; CONTEH V. KANDARIAN, BEATON-PAEZ V. UNITED STATES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
This was a Supreme Court order denying petitions for rehearing in numerous cases decided during the 2001-2002 term. The Court declined to reconsider its previous decisions across a diverse range of legal matters spanning administrative law, criminal procedure, civil rights, and other areas of federal jurisdiction.
© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
ante, p. 816; ante, p. 816; ante, p. 816; ante, p. 819; ante, p. 820; ante, p. 821; ante, p. 802; No. 01-9400. No. 01-9880. No. 01-9996. No. 01-10077. No. 01-10083. No. 01-10138. No. 01-10282. No. 01-10286. No. 01-10290. No. 01-10301. No. 01-10437. No. 01-10472. No. 01-10526. No. 01-10783. No. 01-10803. No. 01-10804. No. 01-10906. No. 01-10919. No. 01-10968. No. 02-4. No. 02-68. No. 02-101. No. 02-104. No. 02-224. No. 02-344. 535 U. S. 1121; ante, p. 829; ante, p. 831; ante, p. 834; ante, p. 834; ante, p. 835; ante, p. 840; ante, p. 840; ante, p. 840; ante, p. 841; ante, p. 844; ante, p. 829; ante, p. 847; ante, p. 863; ante, p. 864; ante, p. 864; ante, p. 870; ante, p. 871; ante, p. 874; ante, p. 878; ante, p. 882; ante, p. 883; ante, p. 811; ante, p. 887; ante, p. 950; No. 02-5017. No. 02-5082. No. 02-5102. No. 02-5131. No. 02-5152. No. 02-5238. No. 02-5322. No. 02-5377. No. 02-5396. No. 02-5412. No. 02-5439. No. 02-5500. No. 02-5562. No. 02-5581. No. 02-5641. No. 02-5646. No. 02-5658. No. 02-5719. No. 02-5760. No. 02-5783. No. 02-6094. No. 02-6124. No. 02-6157. ante, p. 890; ante, p. 893; ante, p. 894; ante, p. 896; ante, p. 898; ante, p. 903; ante, p. 908; ante, p. 911; ante, p. 913; ante, p. 811; ante, p. 915; ante, p. 919; ante, p. 923; ante, p. 924; ante, p. 952; ante, p. 953; ante, p. 927; ante, p. 946; ante, p. 955; ante, p. 931; ante, p. 940; ante, p. 961; and ante, p. 962. Petitions for rehearing denied.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Wisconsin v. Env't Prot. Agency, 535 U.S. 1121 (U.S. 2002)
- Gonzalez et ux. v. United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Cir., 535 U.S. 1121 (U.S. 2002)