BARROZO-AGUIRRE
v.
UNITED STATES
BARROZO-AGUIRRE
UNITED STATES
537 U.S. 939
Supreme Court of the United States (2002)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hughes v. State, 901 So. 2d 837 (Fla. 2005)…oactively. First, the defendant already has been convicted based on the reasonable doubt standard.6 Apprendi affects only the procedure for enhancing the sentence. See United States v. Sanchez-Cervantes, 282 F. 3d 664, 671 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 939, 123 S.Ct. 48, 154 L.Ed.2d 243 (2002); see also State v. Tallard, 149 N.H. 183, 816 A. 2d 977, 981 (2003) (‘Apprendi altered the procedure under which an enhanced sentence can be imposed. It did not affect the procedure for obtaining an [*844] accur…1 / 3
-
Windom v. State, 886 So. 2d 915 (Fla. 2004)…7, 123 S.Ct. 1919, 155 L.Ed.2d 840 (2003); Goode v. United States, 305 F. 3d 378, 382-85 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1096, 123 S.Ct. 711, 154 L.Ed.2d 647 (2002); United States v. Sanchez-Cervantes, 282 F. 3d 664, 671 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 939, 123 S.Ct. 48, 154 L.Ed.2d 243 (2002); Curtis v. United States, 294 F. 3d 841, 843-44 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 976, 123 S.Ct. 451, 154 L.Ed.2d 334 (2002); United States v. Mora, 293 F. 3d 1213, 1218-19 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 9…