RIPPY, BY NEXT FRIENDS, RIPPY ET UX.
v.
HATTAWAY, COMMISSIONER, TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN'S SERVICES, ET AL.
RIPPY, BY NEXT FRIENDS, RIPPY ET UX.
HATTAWAY, COMMISSIONER, TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN'S SERVICES, ET AL.
537 U.S. 812
Supreme Court of the United States (2002)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
van Poyck v. State, 116 So. 3d 347 (Fla. 2013)…or writ of habeas corpus in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. Federal ha-beas relief was denied. Van Poyck v. Fla. Dep’t of Corr. (Van Poyck III), 290 F. 3d 1318 (11th Cir.2002), cert. denied, Van Poyck v. Moore, 537 U.S. 812, 123 S.Ct. 70, 154 L.Ed.2d 13 (2002). The federal district court granted a certificate of appeala-bility as to six claims.9 The Eleventh Cir [*353] cuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court’s denial of relief. Id. In December 2002, Van Poyc…
-
Shotz v. City OF Plantation, 344 F.3d 1161 (11th Cir. 2003)…con. Cmty. Action Program, Inc., 294 F. 3d at 53-54 (city withdrew prior funding commitment allegedly in retaliation for ADA-protected activity); Popovich v. Cuyahoga County Ct. of Common Pleas, 276 F. 3d 808, 816 (6th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 812, 123 S.Ct. 72, 154 L.Ed.2d 15 (2002) (alleged "retaliation by the state domestic relations court against [a party] for requesting hearing assistance and then filing an administrative complaint with the [DOJ]”); Amir v. St. Louis Univ., 184 F. 3d 101…