IN RE NUBINE
IN RE NUBINE
536 U.S. 920
Supreme Court of the United States (2002)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
Sup. Ct. Tex. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certio-rari dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam). Justice Stevens dissents. See id., at 4, and cases cited therein.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Scarborough v. Principi, 541 U.S. 401 (U.S. 2004)…73 F. 3d, at 1092. We granted Scarborough’s initial petition for a writ of cer-tiorari, vacated the judgment of the Court of Appeals, and remanded the case in light of this Court’s decision in Edelman v. Lynchburg College, 535 U. S. 106 (2002). See 536 U. S. 920 (2002). Edelman concerned an Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) regulation relating to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; the regulation allowed amendment of an employment discrimination charge, timely filed with the EEOC, to add…
Authorities Cited
- Martin v. Dist. of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1 (U.S. 1992)