VIRGINIA
v.
MARYLAND
VIRGINIA
MARYLAND
536 U.S. 903
Supreme Court of the United States (2002)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Brown v. Legal Found. of Wash., 538 U.S. 216 (U.S. 2003)…e, but also to answer a question that none of those judges reached, namely, whether injunctive relief is available because the small amounts to which they claim they are entitled render recovery through litigation impractical. We granted certiorari. 536 U. S. 903 (2002). III While it confirms the State’s authority to confiscate private property, the text of the Fifth Amendment imposes two conditions on the exercise of such authority: the taking must be for a “public use” and “just compensation” must be pai…