SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT
v.
UNITED STATES; MAINE YANKEE ATOMIC POWER CO. V. UNITED STATES; AND OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT V. UNITED STATES

U.S. | 2002-05-28
Nos. 01-1020; No. 01-1155; No. 01-1398
535 U.S. 1095 Supreme Court of the United States (2002) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Coleman Jackson v. State Bd. OF Pardons & Paroles, 331 F.3d 790 (11th Cir. 2003)
    …its various subsections, constitutional. See Foulk v. Charrier, 262 F. 3d 687, 704 (8th Cir.2001) (concluding that § 1997e(d)(2) survives rational basis review); Walker v. Bain, 257 F. 3d 660, 670 (6th Cir.2001) (concluding the same), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 1095, 122 S.Ct. 2291, 152 L.Ed.2d 1050 (2002); Radix v. Johnson, 230 F. 3d 840, 847 (6th Cir.2000) (concluding that § 1997e(d)(3) survives rational basis review); Boivin v. Black, 225 F. 3d 36, 46 (1st Cir.2000) (concluding that § 1997e(d)(2) survives ra…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw