ANTONIO PEREZ, PETITIONER,
v.
SEACOAST TRANSPORTATION COMPANY AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION, RESPONDENTS

Fla. | 1971-05-26
No. 40683
Roberts, C. J., Ervin, J., Carlton, J., McCain, J., Dekle, J.
249 So. 2d 21 Florida Supreme Court (1971)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The Florida Supreme Court granted certiorari and vacated the Industrial Relations Commission's order, remanding for more adequate findings of fact regarding whether Seacoast Transportation Company was an independent corporate entity separate from Seaboard Coastline Railroad.


Holding

The Industrial Relations Commission's findings of fact regarding the independent corporate existence of Seacoast Transportation Company were inadequate for appellate review and the case must be remanded for further findings.


Headnotes

[1] Findings of fact regarding corporate existence must be sufficiently detailed to permit meaningful appellate review; conclusory or inadequate findings require remand for f…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Claimant Perez sought review of an Industrial Relations Commission order that reversed a Judge of Industrial Claims order regarding the Commission's j…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

By petition for writ of certiorari claimant seeks review of an order of the Industrial Relations Commission reversing an order of the Judge of Industrial Claims. The order of the Claims Judge held that the Industrial Relations Commission had jurisdiction of the subject matter of, and parties to, the instant case.

We conclude that the findings of fact contained in the order of the Judge of Industrial Claims on the issue of the independent corporate existence of Seacoast Transportation Company apart from that of Seaboard Coastline Railroad are wholly inadequate to permit intelligent review.

Accordingly, the petition for writ of cer-tiorari is granted without oral argument, the order of the Full Commission is vacated, and the Full Commission is hereby directed to remand the cause to the Judge of Industrial Claims for further findings of fact, and for entry of an order in compliance with the requirements of the act and decisions thereunder. See Hardy v. City of Tarpon Springs, 81 So.2d 503 (Fla.1955); and Ball v. Mann, 75 So.2d 758 (Fla.1954). The Judge of Industrial Claims may require additional testimony of the parties if he deems such necessary.

An attorney’s fee of $350.00 is awarded to claimant’s attorney.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON and McCAIN, JJ., concur.

DEKLE, J., dissents.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw